Democratic socialist – Gurugama http://gurugama.org/ Sun, 26 Sep 2021 02:47:56 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 http://gurugama.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/favicon-16.png Democratic socialist – Gurugama http://gurugama.org/ 32 32 The modest leadership of Chuck Schumer | The Economist http://gurugama.org/the-modest-leadership-of-chuck-schumer-the-economist/ Sun, 26 Sep 2021 01:18:14 +0000 http://gurugama.org/the-modest-leadership-of-chuck-schumer-the-economist/ Sep 25, 2021 ASELF-DESCRIBED “angry centrist”, Chuck Schumer liked to fight the radical fringe of his party. In a center-left manifesto he published in 2007, titled “Positively American,” the Senate majority leader shuddered as he recalled the left-wing activists he met at Harvard in the 1960s who ” seemed to want to demolish all systems. […]]]>

ASELF-DESCRIBED “angry centrist”, Chuck Schumer liked to fight the radical fringe of his party. In a center-left manifesto he published in 2007, titled “Positively American,” the Senate majority leader shuddered as he recalled the left-wing activists he met at Harvard in the 1960s who ” seemed to want to demolish all systems. “He despised even more his party’s reluctance to repudiate them.” In politics you have to either defend or denounce what your friends say, “Mr Schumer wrote.” If you don’t do it. no, people start to wonder what you really believe. “

Listen to this story

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on ios Where Android.

The militant group he recalled has evolved into the Democratic Socialists of America, the best-known member of which is Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She is generally thought to be reflecting on a main challenge for Mr. Schumer. Yet far from defining himself against his radicalism, he, the lesser known of the veteran Democratic trio leading the government, adopted it. He often appears alongside Ms. Ocasio-Cortez in New York City. And he’s embraced some of his causes, student debt cancellation and the legal pot. For the many conservatives who detect AOCthe socialist hand in everything Democrats do, Mr Schumer is Exhibit A.

Democrats have indeed turned to the left, albeit more modestly than their opponents claim. And since he’s always swam in the mainstream of the party, just like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, the other members of the triumvirate, he naturally evolved with him. Yet his benevolence towards the Queens fire thrower isn’t just about protecting his left flank. It reflects Mr. Schumer’s general approach to keeping the Senate majority as slim as possible.

With just 50 votes plus that of Kamala Harris, the vice-president, and no prospect of Republican support on almost any of the major bills Mr Biden wants to pass, Mr Schumer cannot afford to lose a single Democrat. Even with a larger majority and less ambition, his Republican predecessor has shown how difficult it will be. Mitch McConnell passed a tax cut, did not remove Obamacare and stayed there. And the left, a tribe made up of Joe Manchin and Bernie Sanders, is more quarrelsome than the right. Mr Schumer’s response has essentially been to encourage his colleagues to push for whatever they prefer in Mr Biden’s loosely defined agenda. And he did so persistently, prompting the group to stick together, in the hope that the more a falling out can be avoided, the less likely it will be.

Where Mr. McConnell and Harry Reid, the former Democrat in his office, maintained an immense aura of power, Mr. Schumer, the first New Yorker and Jew to occupy it, has a more laid-back style. It has tripled the size of Mr. Reid’s kitchen cabinets, making it less of a dreaded coterie of lieutenants than a team-building exercise, which includes Mr. Sanders and Mr. Manchin. With his flip phone always close at hand, he spends much of the day calling around his caucus, congratulating, cuddling or just checking on. The results of his more modest approach are better than many Democrats expected.

A former attention-seeking lawmaker (“the most dangerous place is between him and a camera,” Bob Dole joked) and campaign strategist, Mr Schumer has reportedly lacked the grip of Ms Pelosi, his counterpart at the Bedroom. Yet among Democrats he is now universally praised. “It’s literally impossible to imagine anyone else doing the job,” says Chris Coons of Delaware.

An unannounced success will do this. Mr Schumer has been credited with urging Mr Manchin to comply with the $ 1.9 billion stimulus package Democrats passed in March. He’s also the architect of a hitherto successful fork in infrastructure spending – which some Republicans support – and the backpack of safety nets and climate measures Democrats hope to adopt on a partisan basis. . Even as this “two-way” process enters what promises to be a last phase of heated negotiations (which a customary fall dispute over government funding threatens to make even more difficult), a large majority of Democrats are pushing for it. firmly supports.

No one should confuse this with a good way to rule America. Much like Mr Schumer’s leadership style, Something For Everyone, Democrats’ efforts to incorporate the value of a presidential term in new programs and reforms into a budget bill exemplify their weakness and a failing system. A decade of deadlock suggests that there is no other way forward on climate change, inequality and other big issues. However, their approach is nonetheless fraught with shortcomings.

The old theory that bipartisan bargaining, conducted in good faith, produces better laws still stands. The excesses of the stimulus package over the sleeker infrastructure deal illustrate this truth. And Mr. Schumer’s light leadership looks like the particular enemy of tough choices. If and when Mr Manchin seeks to dramatically reduce the $ 3.5 billion cost of the budget bill, Democrats should abandon some of their more sustainable programs, such as the free community college, in order to preserve the climate and other essentials. Still, a general haircut, which anyone could live with grumbling, may be more in keeping with Mr. Schumer’s approach.

It might not go that far. His efforts to prolong the negotiation could accumulate an even more dramatic and damaging explosion. Besides, even if Democrats adopt some semblance of their plans, it’s not clear voters would reward them for it.

The uncertain reward of virtue

Their baggy monster of a budget bill, to use Henry James’ phrase, seems too sprawling to be reduced to an effective slogan. The Republican attack on it as socialism would be easier to carry out. When working on campaign strategy, Mr. Schumer would have had this flaw in mind. Now absorbed in the unlikely task of passing laws, he seems unable to do so. Whatever he says to his colleagues, his party cannot have it all.

For more information on Joe Biden’s presidency, visit our dedicated hub

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the title “Chuck’s Modest Leadership”


Source link

]]>
Two unique and powerful forces will influence the mid-term http://gurugama.org/two-unique-and-powerful-forces-will-influence-the-mid-term/ Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:37:30 +0000 http://gurugama.org/two-unique-and-powerful-forces-will-influence-the-mid-term/ If the 2022 midterm elections had an official soundtrack, it would be the disturbing music for the 1975 film ”Jaws.“ Although the elections are 13 months away, the increasing intensity makes it seem like great white sharks are circling our national boat with a convergence of two powerful political forces never seen before. Both forces […]]]>

If the 2022 midterm elections had an official soundtrack, it would be the disturbing music for the 1975 film ”Jaws.

Although the elections are 13 months away, the increasing intensity makes it seem like great white sharks are circling our national boat with a convergence of two powerful political forces never seen before. Both forces are the hangover of the 2020 election with the potential to make 2022 the most tumultuous midterms in modern American history.

The first force is the growing lack of confidence of voters in our electoral system. Second, the imminent presence of Donald J. Trump, a one-tenure and twice impeached human lightning rod, who is still the de facto leader of the Republican Party. No former president in history has ever injected himself into the midterms to this degree, and certainly not into the primary process.

Curious about Matt Schlapp’s take on these two forces, I contacted the renowned president of the American Conservative Union. A staunch supporter of Trump, Schlapp is one of the most influential Republicans in the country, and as a host of CPAC, he leads a powerful MAGA army.

It is clear that he, like the titular leader of this army, did not really accept the results of the 2020 vote.

“Having a big question mark over a presidential election is bad for democracy,” Schlapp said. “We should know who won. And one of the ways we’ll know is if we’re all following the same rules. We have to start voting again like we did in 2016. Will the Democrats try to pull off the same shenanigans next year? I know this: The American people are outraged by the Democratic agenda, and if we vote fairly, they will be bombed. “

There is a story of new presidents getting “shelled” in their first midterm election, their party losing control of the House, Senate, or both. In 2010, President Obama used “Crushing” to describe his first monumental mid-term defeat when Republicans took control of the House with a net gain of 63 seats – a number not achieved since 1948. The vice-president at the time, Joe Biden, surely remembers this repudiation.

Perhaps the most astonishing mid-term defeat was that of Bill Clinton in 1994. Forty-two years had passed since the Republicans took full control of Capitol Hill. The architect of this remarkable victory which won the GOP 54 House and eight Senate seats was Newt Gingrich, who became Speaker of the House.

I emailed Gingrich, asking if 2022 had the makings of a GOP win tied with 1994.

“If Republicans can discipline themselves to consistently describe Democrats as ‘big government socialists’ and the $ 3.5 trillion spending and $ 3 trillion tax hike as big socialist bills government – this is, after all, Senator Bernie Sanders’ bill – I think we can earn a massive victory in the House and Senate next year, ”Gingrich replied.

I also asked Schlapp to weigh in on the prospects for a 1994 scale victory. He happily bites the hook.

“Guaranteed!” noted. “Unless we don’t have the courage to stand up to cheating. Otherwise, it will be more mixed. If the left understands that we are going to go to the barricades to make sure cheating is exposed, then I think their agenda will be rejected. “

Then, after exposing Biden’s liberal left agenda, Schlapp said, “When people understand the politics of socialism, they reject it in this country.”

On Trump, former president’s midterm pledge is a force to be reckoned with for both parties. I asked Schlapp if Trump’s involvement was a winning strategy for the GOP.

“I think President Trump is doing what it takes to spend his time and money making sure we win as many seats in the Senate and Congress as possible, and I applaud him for that,” he said. he replied. “In the past he’s been accused of not spending so much time on those mid-course races. Now he is committed to doing so and he will help us win many seats through these efforts. “

Then I asked Schlapp, “If the Republicans do well in 2022, will Trump take credit for it?” And if they don’t, will Trump say it’s because his name wasn’t on the ballot? With either result, will he see it his way? Schlapp parried this point.

“If Republicans, with so many promises, end up hurting halfway through, I think it would likely have a negative impact on President Trump’s thinking about the candidacy. [in 2024]He said. “Democrats have never embraced this type of radical political agenda. And if this turns out to be popular with the American people, I think it’s going to be very disheartening for Republicans. I don’t think so. not that the chances of that happening are very high, but I’m willing to accept the premise. “

However, if the mid-terms of 2022 are going well for the GOP and Trump decides to run, I asked Schlapp if he thinks Trump would have main opposition or be crowned a candidate without a fight. He told me:

“I think Trump will have major adversaries, a path without Trump, and I don’t know how many there will be. President Trump should want these opponents because he’s so much better in the ring when he’s competing against someone. I don’t know if I can see him being crowned. I don’t know how he would react to that – he’s so used to fighting! But Trump will be a better candidate if he has to hire someone immediately. I think the primaries can be a good thing.

Then Schlapp proclaimed, “If Trump shows up again, he’s basically the incumbent. “

Meanwhile, listen to the ominous music of sharks spinning in the water. With voters’ lack of confidence in our electoral system, Trump taking center stage, Democrats in disarray, legal redistribution battles looming, Biden failing quickly, and all the collective, economic and cultural angst of our country. nation, I remember the most famous line of “Jaws as we approach mid-term 2022: “We’re going to need a bigger boat.

Myra Adams is a media producer and writer with numerous national credits. She served on the McCain Ad Council during the 2008 GOP Candidate’s Campaign and on the 2004 Bush Campaign Creative Team. She can be reached at MyraAdams01@gmail.com or @MyraKAdams on Twitter.


Source link

]]>
Chelsea Manning challenges try to ban her permanently from Canada under Ottawa’s state secrecy laws http://gurugama.org/chelsea-manning-challenges-try-to-ban-her-permanently-from-canada-under-ottawas-state-secrecy-laws/ Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:19:46 +0000 http://gurugama.org/chelsea-manning-challenges-try-to-ban-her-permanently-from-canada-under-ottawas-state-secrecy-laws/ Chelsea Manning speaks to the media, Friday, May 11, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo / Jacquelyn Martin) Once again, US whistleblower Chelsea Manning is rising to defend fundamental democratic principles under attack by a capitalist government determined to hide its actions from the public. The Canadian government plans to argue that Manning should be permanently […]]]>
Chelsea Manning speaks to the media, Friday, May 11, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo / Jacquelyn Martin)

Once again, US whistleblower Chelsea Manning is rising to defend fundamental democratic principles under attack by a capitalist government determined to hide its actions from the public.

The Canadian government plans to argue that Manning should be permanently barred from entering the country during an Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) hearing scheduled for October 7. The government claims Manning is inadmissible to Canada for “serious criminality.” citing section 16 (2) of the Information Security Act, 1985, which criminalizes “disclosing to a foreign entity or terrorist group information that the Government of Canada or a province takes measures to protect … “Canadian interests” results. Manning plans to challenge the constitutionality of the law, regardless of the outcome of the IRB hearing.

In the upside down world inhabited by Canadian government lawyers, “serious criminality” refers to Manning’s “use of a computer” to expose the crimes of Canadian and American imperialism in Afghanistan, crimes that the Canadian state would prefer to keep it hidden afterwards. of the humiliating retirement from Kabul last month.

In 2010, Manning, who worked as a US military analyst, posted hundreds of thousands of US military files and diplomatic cables from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the WikiLeaks media organization. These revelations include the infamous “Collateral Murder” video, recording the crew of an American gunship as they slaughter a group of Iraqis in cold blood while expressing their frenzied thirst for blood.

More than 250,000 diplomatic cables leaked by Manning have exposed the inner workings of US and Canadian imperialism. The material she shared, including reports of the murderous rampages of American soldiers, torture and massive corruption, exposed the Canadian government’s claims that it was in Afghanistan to defend “human rights.” and “democracy” as a bunch of lies. Manning’s revelations, along with those of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, also laid bare the global espionage operations of the imperialist powers in which Canada, as a member of the “Five Eyes” alliance led by the United States, plays a key role.

For her “crimes”, Manning was sentenced to 35 years in the US military high security prison at Fort Leavenworth and subjected to conditions bordering on torture for seven years, including solitary confinement. Her sentence was commuted by outgoing US President Barack Obama in 2017. Manning was then jailed twice for over a year as US authorities attempted to force her to testify in a secret grand jury case against the founder and jailed WikiLeaks journalist Julian Assange. Manning was fined $ 1,000 a day for extorting obedience. Manning categorically refused to give in to the pressure, saying, “Nothing will convince me to testify before this grand jury or any other grand jury.” The torture experience led Manning to make several suicide attempts, and she was released soon after.

In his constitutional challenge to Canada’s Security of Information Act, Manning, a person of astonishing political and personal courage, once again acts on principle, defending fundamental democratic rights. Her case has implications not only for her own freedom of movement, which she has every right to defend, but also for the practice of investigative journalism in Canada and around the world.


Source link

]]>
ANOTHER POINT OF VIEW: Both sides bear responsibility for rising federal debt | Opinion http://gurugama.org/another-point-of-view-both-sides-bear-responsibility-for-rising-federal-debt-opinion/ Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:15:00 +0000 http://gurugama.org/another-point-of-view-both-sides-bear-responsibility-for-rising-federal-debt-opinion/ In his September 23 article “GOP Wants No Part of Debt Ceiling Raise; good for them, ”union columnist Hugh Hewitt should have made it clear that the GOP does not want to participate in raising the debt ceiling just because it is requested by the Biden administration. This is politics! The Trump administration raised the […]]]>

In his September 23 article “GOP Wants No Part of Debt Ceiling Raise; good for them, ”union columnist Hugh Hewitt should have made it clear that the GOP does not want to participate in raising the debt ceiling just because it is requested by the Biden administration. This is politics! The Trump administration raised the debt ceiling three times: December 2017, March 2019 and August 2019.

Upon entering the White House, any newly elected president does not, to a large extent, control first-year federal spending. The expenses are a legacy of the former Congress and the President.

As such, the increase in the debt ceiling in December 2017 is not necessarily the fault of the previous Congress or Donald Trump. Ditto for this year’s Congress and the Biden administration.

In an interview with Fox News, our Congressman Kevin McCarthy claimed that the latest debt ceiling extension, in 2019, “paid for everything in the Trump administration, plus seven months of that Biden administration.” However, according to Salvador Rizzo of the Washington Post, this is not true. According to Rizzo, “Today the government continues to borrow money to pay for the policies Trump enacted, such as the 2017 tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy earners.” The national debt increased by $ 7.8 trillion under the Trump administration.

The total federal debt that we taxpayers owe is $ 28 trillion.

The CARES Act added $ 2.2 trillion to the 2020 budget deficit. That said, Trump’s tax cuts in 2017 added $ 5.6 trillion to the cumulative budget deficits. Essentially, the federal government had to borrow $ 5.6 trillion to pay for the tax cuts.

According to the Congressional Research Service, as reported by Rizzo, “Federal debt increased by $ 5.4 trillion from August 2019 (the last time the limit was suspended under Trump) to January 20, 2021 (when Trump left its functions). It rose an additional $ 675 billion in Biden’s nearly seven months in power in August. “

Recognize that we have a federal spending problem and that the 2017 federal tax cuts only exacerbated the federal debt. It’s no wonder if we can’t control federal spending, why we have to raise taxes. But, politics being what it is, when it comes to having to raise the debt ceiling, members of Congress are pointing fingers at each other. Senatorial Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., After three times approving a debt ceiling increase, does not want to participate in the $ 3.5 trillion proposal for future infrastructure and other proposed spending by the Biden administration. This is politics!

With the exception of Bill Clinton, the Republican and Democratic administrations ran budget deficits and, as a result, increased federal debt. The Reagan administration cut taxes and increased budget deficits by 142%. George HW Bush increased the deficit by 36% in one quarter while Clinton had a budget surplus of 1% in two quarters. George W. Bush, who started the fight against terrorism, increased budget deficits by 57% in two terms and ended his last term with the Great Recession. Barack Obama inherited the Great Recession and increased budget deficits by 58% in two terms. Trump inherited a steadily growing economy, removed regulations, cut taxes, and saw his deficit grow 33% in a single term.

Suffice it to say that each president has his own agenda. Federal tax cuts and spending have increased the federal debt. Make no mistake about it, however. Socialist policies don’t just come from Democrats. Republicans have their own form of socialism: corporate socialism through corporate tax cuts and loopholes as well as federal subsidies for many industries. Thank goodness communism is no longer a threat to our capitalist system.

If you, dear reader, have to argue that Democrats are a socialist threat, please take the case of corporate socialism from the Republican side. We only get partisan politics, finesse and selective argumentation that benefit their own political agendas.

Federal tax cuts and runaway federal spending have increased our federal debt.

Luis Medina from Bakersfield has a background in construction and real estate development. Another point of view presents a critical response to a previous editorial, column, or short story.


Source link

]]>
India Walton, Democratic Socialist candidate for mayor of Buffalo http://gurugama.org/india-walton-democratic-socialist-candidate-for-mayor-of-buffalo/ Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:11:20 +0000 http://gurugama.org/india-walton-democratic-socialist-candidate-for-mayor-of-buffalo/ Nurse, organizer and Democratic Socialist India Walton is the Democratic candidate for mayor of Buffalo. She says she is not a Democrat because the party has not kept its promises. She says her policies are meant to help the poor, but they will also benefit the rich. Loading Something is loading. I’m Nicholas Carlson, Insider […]]]>
  • Nurse, organizer and Democratic Socialist India Walton is the Democratic candidate for mayor of Buffalo.
  • She says she is not a Democrat because the party has not kept its promises.
  • She says her policies are meant to help the poor, but they will also benefit the rich.

I’m Nicholas Carlson, Insider Global Editor. Here is the last part of my series, The EIC Interview, condensed and edited for clarity.

How is socialism different from democratic socialism?

I never studied socialism except in elementary school. My values ​​correspond most closely to social programming and the belief that government must serve the people. Getting caught up in the conversation about socialism versus democratic socialism versus democracy is semantics. It’s super confusing. The bottom line is that we are just putting people before profit. As easy as that.

You could probably have a similar political agenda, just call yourself a progressive democrat and not have to deal with all that semantic baggage. So why don’t you just call yourself a Democrat?

Because progressive democrats have done a disservice to the people, and I want to be accountable to the people I serve. We also knew that Buffalo politics worked in a vacuum and that to stand out we had to be different from the same old neoliberal Democrat milquetoast.

When some people hear the word socialist, even if it’s part of ‘democratic socialist‘, they think you want everyone to have the same amount of money and the same lifestyle, no matter how hard they work. or how talented they are. Is this what you want?

Well, you know, as a mayor, I can’t effectively abolish capitalism, can I?

(Laughs)

I think in fact, if people are less poor, rich people will be richer because there is more money circulating in the economy. I believe the poor are working, talented people, but we have a system that has been put in place to keep certain groups of people impoverished while others, you know, are making record profits from the work of others.

So no, I don’t believe that hardworking people should be the only ones poor. Those who work hard should have an equal opportunity for justice and fairness. This means that resources, especially when they come from taxpayers’ money, can benefit the working class.

I sometimes hear people say they don’t want a tie; they want equal opportunity. Is this also your goal?

Well, you know, the word equality is kind of loaded. I prefer to use the term fairness. What fairness means is that if a person has been 50 feet behind the start line for the last hundred years, then we have to provide that 50 feet to bring it back to zero before we can even start, is not it ? This is what fairness means.

Our platform is to bring swamp and fringe people into the mainstream and invest in things we all deserve like quality education, housing, health care, and good paid work.

What do you think about the fact that the rich get richer if the poor are too? You know, is it okay if this is what happens?

If the poor get richer?

This means that, if you put in place programs that help the poor achieve economic gains, is it okay with you if one of the results is that it helps the rich too?

I don’t know if the poor can get “richer” …

(Laughs)

We live in an economic system where, when people are less poor, the natural consequence of that, intended or not, is that the rich keep getting richer, right? So there really is no way for us to prevent the rich from getting richer.

But what we need to do is appeal to the sensibilities of a lot of rich people, that they should pay their fair share, that they should pay their workers a fair and decent wage. And society as a whole will fare better if we don’t expect some people to suffer for the benefit of others.


Source link

]]>
Met Gala presents bold statements http://gurugama.org/met-gala-presents-bold-statements/ Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:43:48 +0000 http://gurugama.org/met-gala-presents-bold-statements/ The Met Gala is an event where fashion is at its peak, and the highest level of designers bring it all in. This year, the theme was American independence, and many celebrities brought their own interpretation to life. A theme throughout referred to old Hollywood movie stars, such as Marilyn Monroe, which was performed by […]]]>

The Met Gala is an event where fashion is at its peak, and the highest level of designers bring it all in. This year, the theme was American independence, and many celebrities brought their own interpretation to life.

A theme throughout referred to old Hollywood movie stars, such as Marilyn Monroe, which was performed by none other than Billie Eilish. Eilish wore a very light pink tile dress, with a train so long it took up most of the stairs at the Met Gala.

There were plenty of other looks throughout the night that paid tribute, like Yara Shahidi’s gown which referenced French artist Joséphine Baker, but there was another strong theme that carried the entire night. night.

The theme of American independence was also interpreted differently, as many celebrities took advantage of this fashion show to raise awareness about certain issues and famous figures from various social justice movements.

One of the most notable outfits corresponding to the social justice theme was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, better known as AOC, wearing a white dress with the words “TAX THE RICH” written in red on the back. .

An article for Vogue titled “AOC Sent Message With Her First Met Gala Appearance,” written by Sarah Spellings, explained the look in detail.

“The Socialist Democratic MP wore a white Brother Vellies dress, splashed with the political slogan on the back…”, Spellings said.

The article also explains how Brother Vellies thought AOC was the perfect candidate for this dress as she is ready to fight for change in this country.

Wear an outfit that reads “Tax the Rich” to an event where some of the richest celebrities were a declaration of power, which boldly flaunted an issue America has faced as many believe the rich should pay taxes higher because of a higher income.

Although bold, this dress fits the theme perfectly, because what could be more American than “fighting” for justice, even if fighting in this scenario means wearing a dress with three simple words.

This year, celebrities have dressed to match the theme in more than one way, from referencing Hollywood legends to fighting social justice issues at one of the biggest events of the year.


Source link

]]>
Letter: Socialism is a milestone on the road to communism http://gurugama.org/letter-socialism-is-a-milestone-on-the-road-to-communism/ Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:05:00 +0000 http://gurugama.org/letter-socialism-is-a-milestone-on-the-road-to-communism/ As for Sherry Kutter’s sarcastic statement (September 10 letter to editor) that Americans don’t want to work, I think some have that attitude. I also agree that some who are doing well criticize the poor. When I see a young mother in the grocery store with her kids in tow pushing a cart full of […]]]>

As for Sherry Kutter’s sarcastic statement (September 10 letter to editor) that Americans don’t want to work, I think some have that attitude. I also agree that some who are doing well criticize the poor.

When I see a young mother in the grocery store with her kids in tow pushing a cart full of expensive groceries, I remember my own mother and our family of seven who grew up in rural Nebraska during the times of the cows. skinny from the ’50s and’ 60s. I also see help-seeking signs everywhere, some offering signing bonuses, health care benefits, and tuition assistance (upgrade your skills for a better job. paid) – not much at the time. In understaffed restaurants, I see waitresses rushing to follow. We give a generous tip.

I strongly disagree with Sherry that a living wage must be established to cover a multitude of living expenses. The Socialists would like another bureaucracy to administer this. Better yet, the Democratic Socialist Party’s platform and its $ 3.5 trillion spending bill offering everything from cradle to grave for free. For those who take the bait offered by the socialist left, I am sorry for them and for their ignorance of the history of socialism over the past 100 years. It is only a milestone on the road to communism. Capitalism is not always beautiful and is defined as the unequal distribution of wealth. Socialism is the ugly and even distribution of poverty.

Sherry’s husband is a veteran. Me too. Between Korea and Vietnam 100,000 lives were lost fighting communism. Just as I feel for the young mother at the grocery store, my heart breaks as I walk past a cemetery knowing that there are those who lay there who have sacrificed their lives for my freedoms; those who have no say in this debate.

Ken krueger

Alexandria, Minnesota


Source link

]]>
Letter: No mandate for socialism http://gurugama.org/letter-no-mandate-for-socialism/ Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:48:00 +0000 http://gurugama.org/letter-no-mandate-for-socialism/ There is no mandate for President Joe Biden’s $ 3.5 trillion, cradle-to-grave irreversible socialism program. The Senate is split 50/50 and Democrats have a slim majority in the House. The country believed it had voted for a moderate Democratic leader and had made a man’s shell controlled by the radical left. The government is already […]]]>

There is no mandate for President Joe Biden’s $ 3.5 trillion, cradle-to-grave irreversible socialism program. The Senate is split 50/50 and Democrats have a slim majority in the House. The country believed it had voted for a moderate Democratic leader and had made a man’s shell controlled by the radical left. The government is already spending 30% of our GDP and these socialist programs will create more government, more unelected bureaucrats, more regulations and less freedom.

Based on the percentage of our GDP, the $ 5,000 billion we have already spent on COVID recovery is the amount spent to recover from the Great Depression. On an annualized basis, inflation is 9% this year and these numbers do not include food, energy or shelter. Add them up and we’re at about 20% inflation. The $ 3.5 trillion will push inflation to even higher levels. The rules of the economy are clear, if you have too much money to hunt too few products, the costs will go up. Our national debt is currently $ 750,000 per person and is unsustainable.

To pay for this program, Biden plans to increase corporate taxes, income taxes on upper and middle incomes, and increase tax on the death rate. Raising corporate taxes will kill American jobs, push jobs overseas, and raise the cost of living as businesses pass them on to the consumer. The death tax will kill farms and family businesses. Low-income families will be affected by rising inflation. Call on your senators and congressmen to kill this bill.



– Tim Schowalter, Granby

The Sky-Hi News strives to deliver powerful stories that evoke emotion and focus on where we live.

Over the past year, contributions from readers like you have helped fund some of our most important reporting, including coverage of the East Troublesome Fire.

If you value local journalism, consider contributing to our newsroom to support the work we do.



Source link

]]>
‘Patriotic Americans’ storm Capitol, anti-vaccines expected to sign waiver http://gurugama.org/patriotic-americans-storm-capitol-anti-vaccines-expected-to-sign-waiver/ Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:00:44 +0000 http://gurugama.org/patriotic-americans-storm-capitol-anti-vaccines-expected-to-sign-waiver/ “Patriotic Americans” beat police officers Maybe the writer of “Ashamed to link September 11 to the January 6 riot”, A letter published on September 16 is expected to take a civic education class alongside the columnist he has criticized, Lynn Schmidt. We will see who passes the class. I think Schmidt will get the highest […]]]>

“Patriotic Americans” beat police officers

Maybe the writer of “Ashamed to link September 11 to the January 6 riot”, A letter published on September 16 is expected to take a civic education class alongside the columnist he has criticized, Lynn Schmidt.

We will see who passes the class. I think Schmidt will get the highest score. The United States is a representative democracy and a constitutional republic. Both are true.

He got me at the “Patriotic American Group”. Patriotic Americans do not come to the nation’s capital dressed in camouflage and wearing bear spray without malicious intent.

Following:How to send a letter to the editor

The intention, of course, was to overthrow a democratic and fair election.

Like the 9/11 terrorists, these people had no respect for human life. Watch the videos. The same people who say “Blue Lives Matter” viciously beat the police.


Source link

]]>
There’s a bad moon rising for Florida Democrats http://gurugama.org/theres-a-bad-moon-rising-for-florida-democrats/ Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:13:40 +0000 http://gurugama.org/theres-a-bad-moon-rising-for-florida-democrats/ Voter registration between Republicans and Democrats is now virtually equal, Previously reported politico. Considering how the GOP has dominated state politics for more than 20 years, some who haven’t paid attention might think Democrats are recruiting thousands of new voters and are on the verge of getting fired. the blue state. But no, not even […]]]>

Voter registration between Republicans and Democrats is now virtually equal, Previously reported politico.

Considering how the GOP has dominated state politics for more than 20 years, some who haven’t paid attention might think Democrats are recruiting thousands of new voters and are on the verge of getting fired. the blue state. But no, not even close.

Republicans won all three branches of state government despite the number of registered voters of less than 700,000 until 2008. By the end of 2012, that number had fallen to nearly 140,000.

Democrats still held a margin of around 100,000 in the 2020 election (which didn’t help them much).

As of August 31, that number had fallen to 23,551.

If the Democrats managed to lose with this decisive advantage over registered voters, what would happen now? There is a bad moon that rises unless they pull themselves together.

political journalist Matt Dixon called it “a political fire of five alarms directed towards the mid-terms of 2022”.

I have a few theories as to what happened, but first let me offer you this snippet from Democratic Consultant Steve Schale’s blog.

“We need to start meeting voters where they are. Too many Democrats assume that a “modeling score” is concrete proof that some voters will absolutely vote or not vote for us, and we ignore them, “he wrote.

“Guess what, we prove the model, and they don’t vote for us, or they don’t show up because we assume they will vote. Republicans don’t work that way. They aggressively attack “our voters”, and the results speak for themselves.

Democrats, once the workers’ party, have allowed themselves to be labeled as socialists, elitists, taxo-holics and, worse yet, unpatriotic. Meanwhile, Republicans have kept a consistent message: jobs, the economy, security, guns, law and order, and – we mentioned – jobs.

And Schale is right when he says Democrats tend to strike off large segments of voters.

Two words: The Villages.

They allowed Republicans to create a narrative that the teachers’ union has ruined public education. Democrats stammered and stammered during the riots in the aftermath of the George floyd murder.

Republicans – looking at you, Gov. Ron DeSantis – succeeded in tipping the story of a police reform to the need to explode the head against unruly crowds.

When Republicans fought against a minimum wage of $ 15 an hour, Democrats should have argued that skyrocketing rents and wage inequality were creating major problems for millions of Floridians.

But they didn’t.

Republicans keep it simple. You know where they stand on the issues, and they keep pace with Tallahassee. And when their mistakes hurt people – as we saw during the pandemic – they blame the media for their reporting.

Like it or not, strategy is political genius. The latest registration numbers prove it.

As we move closer to the 2022 election, polls show DeSantis approval numbers down. I don’t think it matters, though.

His campaign chest will have more money than Fort Knox. That will be more than enough to label his Democratic challenger – Charlie crist Where Nikki Fried – a socialist who wants to indoctrinate your children with a critical theory of race and teach them to hate America.

The Democrats’ best (and perhaps the only) hope is to convince the state’s nearly 3.8 million independent voters that they have the best vision.

Of course, that would help articulate that vision first and repeat it until the words permeate. And Dems better hope it’s more than “DeSantis.” Bad. We. Good.”

It didn’t work against Rick scott Where Marco rubio, and it didn’t work here last year against Donald trump.

Maybe it’s time for a new game plan.

Oh, and register more voters too. It might help.


Publication displays:
40


Source link

]]>